Risk Level assessment
Le Cert-IST follows the metric defined by the EISPP project (format version 1.2) in order to assess the vulnerabilities risk level.
The Risk indicates to
the reader how important the vulnerability is, and
how urgently appropriate measures must be taken to counter the threat. The
table below lists the Cert-IST recommendations on how to react depending on the
risk level.
|
Risk
|
Recommendation
|
| Very high
|
Act immediately on all systems
|
|
High
|
Act immediately on front-end
systems and servers
|
|
Medium
|
Action can be delayed, but a
security maintenance operation must be scheduled now
|
|
Low
|
Action can be delayed until
the next scheduled maintenance operation
|
Cert-IST advisory nomenclatureInformation published by CERT-IST is identified as follows : CERT-IST/tt-AAAA-nnn Vi.j
with:
tt Information Type : AV for security Advisories, AL for Alerts, DG for Potentiel Dangers, IF for Interesting Information
AAAA Year (4 digits)
nnn Identifier (3 digits)
i.j Advisory version 1.0 is the first version
"j" is incremented for each minor update (e.g.: 1.1)
for a major update, "i" is incremented and "j" is reset to 0 (ex : 2.0)
Examples :
- CERT-IST/AV-2005.100 V 1.0 for the 100th advisory published in 2005,
- CERT-IST/AV-2005.101 V 1.1 for the first minor revision of the 101st advisory in 2005,
- CERT-IST/AV-2005.101 V 2.0 for the first major revision of the 101st advisory in 2005, etc...
Confidence level definition
For
each advisory it releases, the Cert-IST rates a "confidence level"
field. The different confidence levels are set as follows :
Official and tested vulnerability :
the vulnerability has been released by an official authority (CERT/CC,
CIAC, AusCERT, ...) or by a vendor, and tested by the Cert-IST,
Official vulnerability : the vulnerability has been released by an official authority or by a vendor,
Tested vulnerability : the vulnerability has not been released by an official authority or a vendor but it was successfully tested by the Cert-IST,
Probable vulnerability :
the vulnerability has not been released by an official authority or a
vendor, but is it highly probable (cross-checked between several
information sources),
Not qualified vulnerability : the
vulnerability has not been released by an official authority or a
vendor, it couldn't be tested nor crosschecked, but its criticity
justifies the advisory which must be taken "with caution". Beware :
those advisories must not be forwarded "as such".